michael-dean-k/

Emerson said a divine intelligence with a simple cause leads to endless variety. We are, rightly so, locked into humanism, but you also can’t assume that man is the ideal end form of this process. For all we known mankind could be relative devils—violent ants, with only a few angels among us—compared to other potential species from past or future in the unknown nooks of spacetime. We could be the necessary chaff, an evolutionary dead end, that’s iterated through in order to let a truly divine species emerge. I’m not implying this in a post-human sense; in fact, the very possibility of man evolving into a mechanical shell of itself could be the proof that we are not a stable species. Dark, but I do mean this all in a positive, hermetic sense, that we come from a cosmic engine that makes mountains, mice, humans, and psychologies unimaginable, which is our role to evolve into.

Terence McKenna always had this half-baked idea/joke that mushrooms are extra-terrestrial. There’s a source in my "Babbling Idiot" essay from 2024 that dates mushrooms back to 60-65 million years ago, the date when the asteroid hit and made the dinosaurs extinct.

There’s some speculation that, if psilocybin did arrive extra-terrestrially, then it’s a kind of slow-moving alien fungus that’s able to bend certain forms of matter to create the conditions for language (high-bandwidth information processing) to occur.

Humans then became the host of that impulse, eventually creating machines that could make information processing even more dense. Maybe it’s not a coincidence that if you map LLMs they look a lot like fungal networks. This ties into that William Burroughs quote: "language is a virus from outer space.”

It ultimately frames humanity as a pass-through entity. It somehow explains our past and future, and becomes a catalyst to consider language itself as our ultimate life-force/medium of agency. I don't yearn for a transhumanist future, but when you think at cosmological time scales, it's hard to see the human as a stable form. (The issue with technologically-accelerated evolution is the speed, recklessness, and inequality in how it happens.)